On 11/12/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 18:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Perhaps, if we're worried about people keeping perl somewhere other
than /usr/bin. However, the most likely reason for having a
/usr/local/bin/perl or whatever is that it's a newer and shinier one
than what's in /usr/bin. Since we're only interested in bog-standard
perl, there's no real reason for us to want to pick up the local one.
After the Perl version of duplicate_oids was committed, some non-Windows
build farm member failed because it didn't have perl in /usr/bin. So
that appears to be a real issue.
As Robert pointed out, The build process should be, and now is, invoking
it via $(PERL), so how is this still an issue?
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
