On 12 November 2013 20:54, Nigel Heron <nhe...@querymetrics.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <dev...@gunduz.org> wrote: ... >> http://svn.pgrpms.org/browser/rpm/redhat/9.3/postgresql/F-19/postgresql-9.3.service >> is an example of what we use in the RPMs. (if website fails, please just >> reload) >> >> Attached is a modified version that will work with the compile defaults.
> Hi, should we put PGPORT in the systemd file without an easy way to override > it? > As an example, when yum updating minor versions on fedora 18 (using > the yum.postgresql.org rpms), any changes to the systemd service file > are overwritten by the new rpm and the port is forced back to 5432. > This makes having pg9.2 and pg9.3 on the same box conflict after each > minor version update. IIRC there's a "%config(noreplace)" directive in the .spec that can cause the new file to be saved with an extension (.rpmnew?) instead of overwriting the old one. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
