Tom Lane dijo: > It seems to me that DROP ONLY should set attislocal true on each child > for which it decrements the inherit count, whether the count reaches > zero or not. This would cause the behavior in the above case to be that > c.f1 stays around after the second drop (but can be dropped with a third > drop of c.f1 itself). I think this is correct, since the implication of > DROP ONLY is that child columns are being cut loose from their parent's > apron strings and now have independent existence.
Yes, I think it's more consistent the way you are proposing. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>) "Acepta los honores y aplausos y perderas tu libertad" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
