En 23 Sep 2002 10:23:06 +0200 Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Tom Lane kirjutas P, 22.09.2002 kell 18:56: > > It seems to me that DROP ONLY should set attislocal true on each child > > for which it decrements the inherit count, whether the count reaches > > zero or not. > > This would not be what I e'd expect - if c inherited f1 twice and then > one of the parents disinherits it, then it would still be inherited from > the other parent The problem with this is that two sequences of commands only differing in the ordering of two clauses give different result: create table p1 (f1 int, f2 int); create table p2 (f1 int, f2 int); create table c () inherits (p1, p2); alter table only p1 drop column f1; alter table p2 drop column f1; create table p1 (f1 int, f2 int); create table p2 (f1 int, f2 int); create table c () inherits (p1, p2); alter table p2 drop column f1; alter table only p1 drop column f1; The former drops f1 from c, while the latter does not. It's inconsistent. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>) "La Primavera ha venido. Nadie sabe como ha sido" (A. Machado) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
