On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:00AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > > The attached patch changes ABORT from NOTICE to WARNING, and documents >> > > that all other are errors. This "top-level" logic idea came from Robert >> > > Haas, and it has some level of consistency. >> > >> > This patch utterly fails to address my complaint. >> > >> > More to the point, I think it's a waste of time to make these sorts of >> > adjustments. The only thanks you're likely to get for it is complaints >> > about cross-version behavioral changes. Also, you're totally ignoring >> > the thought that these different message levels might've been selected >> > intentionally, back when the code was written. Since there have been >> > no field complaints about the inconsistency, what's your hurry to >> > change it? See Emerson. >> >> My problem was that they issued _no_ message at all. I am fine with >> them issuing a warning if that's what people prefer. As they are all >> SET commands, they will be consistent. > > OK, here is a patch which changes ABORT from NOTICE to WARNING, and SET > from ERROR (which is new in 9.4) to WARNING.
Well, Tom and I are on opposite sides of this, I suppose. I prefer ERROR for everything other than the top-level transaction commands, and see no benefit from opting for a wishy-washy warning. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
