Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:04:19PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> But the documentation says:
>>
>> - Issuing <command>ABORT</> when not inside a transaction does
>> - no harm, but it will provoke a warning message.
>> + Issuing <command>ABORT</> outside of a transaction block has no effect.
>>
>> Those things are not the same.
> Uh, I ended up mentioning "no effect" to highlight it does nothing,
> rather than mention a warning. Would people prefer I say "warning"? Or
> should I say "issues a warning because it has no effect" or something?
> It is easy to change.
I'd revert the change Robert highlights above. ISTM you've changed the
code to match the documentation; why would you then change the docs?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
