J Smith escribió: > We did have some long-running transactions, yes. We refactored a bit > and removed them and the problem ceased on our end. We ended up > reverting our changes for the sake of running this experiment over the > weekend and the errors returned. We've since restored our fix and > haven't had any problems since, so yeah, long-running transactions > appear to be involved. > > We can continue to experiment if you have any additional tests you'd > like us to run. We may have to keep the experiments to running over > the weekend, but they're definitely do-able.
I am working on patches to get these bugs fixed. Would you be up for running a patched binary and see if the errors go away? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
