On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > J Smith escribió: > >> We did have some long-running transactions, yes. We refactored a bit >> and removed them and the problem ceased on our end. We ended up >> reverting our changes for the sake of running this experiment over the >> weekend and the errors returned. We've since restored our fix and >> haven't had any problems since, so yeah, long-running transactions >> appear to be involved. >> >> We can continue to experiment if you have any additional tests you'd >> like us to run. We may have to keep the experiments to running over >> the weekend, but they're definitely do-able. > > I am working on patches to get these bugs fixed. Would you be up for > running a patched binary and see if the errors go away?
Sure, just give me a git commit hash and I can do a test build towards the weekend. I'll include coredumper again just in case things go awry and we can go from there. Cheers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
