On 2013-12-02 19:36:01 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> I'll be glad if you could back-port this. Personally, in practice, 9.1 and
> later will be sufficient.
Already happened:
Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: REL9_3_STABLE [e3480438e] 2013-11-07 16:33:18 -0500
Branch: REL9_2_STABLE [64f5962fe] 2013-11-07 16:33:25 -0500
Branch: REL9_1_STABLE [8cfd4c6a1] 2013-11-07 16:33:28 -0500
Branch: REL9_0_STABLE [8103f49c1] 2013-11-07 16:33:34 -0500
Branch: REL8_4_STABLE [3eb777671] 2013-11-07 16:33:39 -0500
Be more robust when strerror() doesn't give a useful result.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
