On Dec 2, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Whether you're targetting a file system template or a catalog template, > PGXN is not a complete solution, you still need to build the extension. This is true today, but only because PostgreSQL provides the infrastructure for building and installing extensions that entails `make && make install`. If Postgres provided some other method of building and installing extensions, you could start using it right away on PGXN. The *only* requirement for PGXN distributions, really, is a META.json file describing the extension. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
