Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * David E. Wheeler (da...@justatheory.com) wrote: >> This is true today, but only because PostgreSQL provides the >> infrastructure for building and installing extensions that entails `make >> && make install`. If Postgres provided some other method of building and >> installing extensions, you could start using it right away on PGXN. The >> *only* requirement for PGXN distributions, really, is a META.json file >> describing the extension. > > Thanks, that's a pretty interesting point.. I like the idea that we > could provide a new make target which could build an 'inline extension' > (or what-have-you) which could then be distributed and used by users > either directly or with some client-side tool.
+1 -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
