On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I think if we can make something like this work, it would be > neat-o. Getting this working for int4 would be a good win, as Peter > says, but getting it working for both int4 and int8 with the same code > would be a significantly better one.
No arguments here. I think I didn't initially suggest it myself out of passing concern about the guarantees around how unused Datum bits are initialized in all relevant contexts, but having looked at it for a second I see that we are of course disciplined there. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
