Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:45 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Yeah, that's another thing we could simplify if we fixed this problem
>>> at the source. I think these decisions date from a time when we still
>>> cared about the speed of fmgr_oldstyle.
>> Sure, let's whack that thing with a crowbar.
> Or just remove it. Who still needs it?
Lazy people? I'm not in a hurry to drop it; it's not costing us much to
just sit there, other than in this connection which we see how to fix.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
