On 12/5/13, 10:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> We could invent some sneaky syntax variants, like 'pg_klass'::regclass >> errors, but '?pg_klass'::regclass does not. > > Hmm ... cute idea, but shoehorning it into regoperator might be > problematic. You'd have to pick a flag character that wasn't a > valid operator character, which lets out '?' as well as a lot > of the other mnemonically-reasonable choices.
Well, you could pick any letter, I suppose. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
