On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > BTW, another arguable advantage of fixing this via new functions is > that users could write equivalent (though no doubt slower) functions > for use in pre-9.4 releases, and thus not need to maintain multiple > versions of app code that relies on this behavior.
+1 to this idea. Feels cleanest. David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
