On 12/17/2013 06:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management and >> other performance related work. It is quite useful utility. >> +1 for reviving this patch for 9.4 > > Any other votes?
I still support this patch (as I did originally), and don't think that the overlap with pgFincore is of any consequence. pgFincore does more than pgrewarm ever will, but it's also platform-specific, so it still makes sense for both to exist. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
