On 12/24/2013 11:17 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote: > I don't think this bit is quite right. > > It's not correct to assume that all the view columns are simple > references to columns of the base relation --- auto-updatable views > may now contain a mix of updatable and non-updatable columns, so some > of the view columns may be arbitrary expressions.
Ah - it looks like I'd checked against 9.3 and missed the relaxation of those requirements. > There is already code in rewriteTargetView() that does something very > similar (to the whole parsetree, rather than just the returning list) > with 2 function calls: Copying the view tlist and then adjusting it is a much smarter way to do it. I should've seen that the pull-up code could be adapted to deal with the RETURNING list, so thankyou. It's a cleaner way to do it. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
