Bruce Momjian writes: > To summarize, with non-INSTEAD, we get the tag, oid, and tuple count of > the original query. Everyone agrees on that. > > For non-INSTEAD, we have:
[I think this is the INSTEAD part.] > 1) return original tag > 2) return oid if all inserts in the rule insert only one row > 3) return tuple count of all commands with the same tag I think proper encapsulation would require us to simulate the original command, hiding the fact that something else happened internally. I know it's really hard to determine the "virtual" count of an update or delete if the command had acted on a permament base table, but I'd rather maintain the encapsulation of updateable views and return "unknown" in that case. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
