Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am confused how yours differs from mine. I don't see how the last > matching tagged query would not be from an INSTEAD rule.
You could have both INSTEAD and non-INSTEAD rules firing for the same
original query. If the alphabetically-last rule is a non-INSTEAD rule,
then there's a difference.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
