On 10 January 2014 15:47, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > I know there was a desire to remove this TODO item, but I think we have > brought up enough new issues that we can keep it to see if we can come > up with a solution.
Can you summarise what you think the new issues are? All I see is some further rehashing of old discussions. There is already a solution to the "problem" because the docs are already very clear that you need multiple standbys to achieve commit guarantees AND high availability. RTFM is usually used as some form of put down, but that is what needs to happen here. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
