Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4?
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b59794.3000...@gmail.com > I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to > handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if they > are right. Those regression failures certainly say there is something broken in the submitter's build, so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt. I'm not qualified to evaluate the proposed changes, but I wonder why they're needed given that we have successful cygwin builds in the buildfarm. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers