On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4? > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b59794.3000...@gmail.com > > > I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to > > handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if they > > are right. > > Those regression failures certainly say there is something broken in > the submitter's build, so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt. > I'm not qualified to evaluate the proposed changes, but I wonder why > they're needed given that we have successful cygwin builds in the > buildfarm.
Yes, that confuses me too. Unless we get more details, we should ignore the patches. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
