On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > Well maybe. Or we want this useful information at a finer granularity > than "everyone or nobody" and given the choice we prefer to have it > than not.
Anyways, I don't feel incredibly strongly about this. I think we should default any user-data to being visible only that user as a general principle but I also think a system predicated on data like argv or application_name being kept private is pretty fragile and should be avoided so I'm not super tense about additional ways these things can leak. I feel like this is an example where -hackers has a bit of a blind spot when it comes to smaller databases by users who aren't expert DBAs and don't need a dedicated box. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
