Robert Haas escribió: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > I compute 6627 lines as modified. What I did not do is handle _only_ > > cases with periods before the tabs. Should I try that? > > I don't have any comment on that specific point, but I took a quick > look through one of these diffs and it looks like a lot of churn for > no improvement. So I'm not sure what we want to do here, but I don't > think it's this. I, on the contrary, think that the cases that are preceded by a period are an improvement, and the rest are not (the opposite, actually, so better not change those). Maybe there are specific cases in which a period-tab sequence should be kept, but that seems rarer. I didn't check the entire diff obviously, so I can't comment on how good about detecting comments the new entab code is. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
