On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:36:48PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:32:27PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> > Or this: >> > >> > - mp_int_copy(a, b); /* ok: 0 <= r < b */ >> > - mp_int_copy(&q, a); /* ok: q <= a */ >> > + mp_int_copy(a, b); /* ok: 0 <= r < b */ >> > + mp_int_copy(&q, a); /* ok: q <= a */ >> > >> > I do agree with you some of the changes-after-periods look like >> > improvements; what I meant to say is that there is an awful lot of >> > churn in this patch that is unrelated to that particular point. >> >> Let me work on a entab patch that does replacements in comments only >> after periods and post the results. I should be done in an hour. > > OK, eight hours later, I have the results for only removing tabs after > periods in comments: > > http://momjian.us/expire/entab_comment.v2.cdiff > http://momjian.us/expire/entab_comment.v2.pdiff > http://momjian.us/expire/entab_comment.v2.udiff > > The diff line counts are: > > 64356 entab_comment.v2.cdiff > 17327 entab_comment.v2.pdiff > 35453 entab_comment.v2.udiff > > It represents 3903 lines changed.
That looks loads better. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
