On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it> wrote: > Hi Michael and Fujii, > > Il 01/02/14 17:46, Fujii Masao ha scritto: >> I think that it's OK to add that as TODO item. There might be >> the system that the speed of WAL archiving is slower than >> that of WAL generation, at peak time. The DBA of that system >> might want to monitor the size of archive queue. > I agree that it is an interesting thing to do. The reason I didn't > introduce it in the first place was that I did not want to make too many > changes in this first attempt. For the time being I have added an item in "Statistics Collector" about that.
>> We can implement this by just counting the files with .ready >> extension in pg_xlog/archive_status directory. Or we can also >> implement that by adding new counter field in pg_stat_archiver >> structure, incrementing it whenever creating .ready file, and >> decrementing it whenever changing .ready to .done. > I would love to give it a shot at the next opportunity. Will be happy to look at it once you get something. Regards, -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
