On 2014-02-13 16:15:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes: > > Perhaps we should use a lock to enforce that only one process tries to > > clean up the pending list at a time. > > Something like the attached? Can somebody who's seen this problem confirm > this improves matters? > > (ginInsertCleanup's header comment also needs to be rewritten, but for > testing purposes, this is fine.)
Hm. Won't that possiby lead to the fast tuple list growing unboundedly? I think we would need to at least need to stop using the fast tuple mechanism during gininsert() if it's already too big and do plain inserts. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
