On 2014-02-13 18:49:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2014-02-13 16:15:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Something like the attached? Can somebody who's seen this problem confirm > >> this improves matters? > > > Hm. Won't that possiby lead to the fast tuple list growing unboundedly? > > I think we would need to at least need to stop using the fast tuple > > mechanism during gininsert() if it's already too big and do plain > > inserts. > > No, because we've already got a process working on cleaning it out.
Well, appending to the fast tuple list will normally be fully cached io, cleaning it up not so much. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
