On 2014-02-15 14:35:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Patch attached.
> 
> Committed with some cosmetic adjustments --- thanks!
> 
> > I am not sure whether HAVE_GETOPT is the best condition
> > to use, since it's set by configure by a link based check, same goes for
> > HAVE_INT_OPTERR. The other choices would be relying on HAVE_GETOPT_H or
> > a new AC_CHECK_DECL.
> 
> I'm pretty sure HAVE_GETOPT is *not* what we want to use for the variable
> declarations.  I've tried HAVE_GETOPT_H for the moment, but that may need
> more tweaking depending on what the buildfarm has to say.

I only used it because it was what previously protected the getopt()
declaration in port.h... But that should probably have been depending on
!HAVE_GETOPT_H in the first place.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to