Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> I've applied this and backpatched to 9.3 and 9.2, which is as far back as
> it goes cleanly.
> In 9.1 the build system looked significantly different, which makes it
> strange since the original report in this thread was about 9.1 but the
> patch supplied clearly wasn't for that.
> Does somebody want to look at backpatching this to 9.1 and earlier, or
> should we just say that it's not fully supported on those Windows versions
> unless you apply the registry workaround?
The question I think needs to be asked is not that, but "what about the
mingw and cygwin builds?".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
