On 2014-03-04 12:54:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2014-03-04 09:47:08 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > Can't that be solved by just creating the permanent relation in a new > > relfilenode? That's equivalent to a rewrite, yes, but we need to do that > > for anything but wal_level=minimal anyway. > > Yes, that would work. I've tended to view optimizing away the > relfilenode copy as an indispensable part of this work, but that might > be wrongheaded. It would certainly be a lot easier to make this > happen if we didn't insist on that.
I think it'd already much better than today's situation, and it's a required codepath for wal_level > logical anyway. So even if somebody wants to make this work without the full copy for minimal, it'd still be a required codepath. So I am perfectly ok with a patch just adding that. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
