On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think this isn't a good design.  Per the discussion between Andres
>> and I, I think that I think you should do is make ALTER TABLE .. SET
>> LOGGED work just like VACUUM FULL, with the exception that it will set
>> a different relpersistence for the new relfilenode.  If you do it that
>> way, this will be less efficient, but much simpler, and you might
>> actually finish it in one summer.
>>
>
> Do it like 'VACUUM FULL' for any wal_level?

Yep.  Anything else appears to be a research problem.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to