On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think this isn't a good design. Per the discussion between Andres >> and I, I think that I think you should do is make ALTER TABLE .. SET >> LOGGED work just like VACUUM FULL, with the exception that it will set >> a different relpersistence for the new relfilenode. If you do it that >> way, this will be less efficient, but much simpler, and you might >> actually finish it in one summer. >> > > Do it like 'VACUUM FULL' for any wal_level?
Yep. Anything else appears to be a research problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
