Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > However, if the new hstore type (compatible with the old one) is the > wrapper around jsonb, rather than the other way around, I don't see any > problem with it at all. Most future users are almost certainly going to use > the json interfaces, but we don't want to leave upgraded users behind. (But > of course it has to actually maintain backwards compatibility for that > argument to hold)
Yeah --- all of this turns on whether hstore improvements can be 100% upwards compatible or not. If they are, I don't object to including them; I'd have said it was wasted effort, but if the work is already done then that's moot. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers