On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Daniele Varrazzo > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, psycopg developer here. Not following the entire thread as it's >> quite articulated and not of my direct interest (nor comprehension). >> But if you throw at me a few test cases I can make sure psycopg can >> parse them much before hstore2 is released. > > I don't think that'll be necessary. Any break in compatibility in the > hstore format has been ruled a non-starter for having hstore support > nested data structures. I believe on balance we're content to let > hstore continue to be hstore. jsonb support would certainly be > interesting, though.
Cool, just let me know what you would expect a well-behaved client library to behave. -- Daniele -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
