On 03/11/2014 06:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Mind you, I wouldn't be unhappy to see it go away; it's a kluge and always > has been. I'm just expecting lots of push-back if we try. And it's kind > of hard to resist push-back when you don't have a substitute to offer.
Yeah, what we really need is encapsulated per-DB users and local superusers. I think every agrees that this is the goal, but nobody wants to put in the work to implement a generalized solution. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
