On 21 March 2014 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch. > > FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal > either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by > not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave > known-wrong logic floating around in older branches.
Agreed. It could lead to some other bug by not fixing it. Well spotted, Noah, and thanks, since I believe it was my bug. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
