On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:59:05PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 21 March 2014 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch. > > > > FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal > > either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by > > not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave > > known-wrong logic floating around in older branches. > > Agreed. It could lead to some other bug by not fixing it.
Fair enough. I've back-patched it. -- Noah Misch EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
