On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > * Fabrízio de Royes Mello (fabriziome...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > > > > > * Fabrízio de Royes Mello (fabriziome...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > - CREATE SEQUENCE [ IF NOT EXISTS ] > > > > - CREATE DOMAIN [ IF NOT EXISTS ] > > > > - CREATE EVENT TRIGGER [ IF NOT EXISTS ] > > > > - CREATE ROLE [ IF NOT EXISTS ] > > > > > > > > Seems that no one reviewed this part or was rejected with others? > > > > > > Why don't those fall into the same concern, specifically that what we > > > really want is 'CREATE-OR-REPLACE' semantics for them instead? > > > > > > > Ok, but I think this semantics is desirable just to "CREATE DOMAIN" and > > "CREATE EVENT TRIGGER". > > > > Isn't desirable add CINE to SEQUENCEs and ROLEs? > > Why would it be difficult to have COR for sequences..? Or roles? >
Because they maintain user data? -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
