On Apr5, 2014, at 09:55 , Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 April 2014 08:38, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: >> [snip] releasing it in this state feels a little half-baked >> to me. >> > > I regret writing that almost as soon as I sent it. The last of those > queries is now over 10 times faster than HEAD, which is certainly > worthwhile. What bugs me is that there is so much more potential in > this patch.
Well, the perfect is the enemy of the good as they say. By all means, let's get rid of the O(n^2) behaviour in 9.5, but let's get a basic version into 9.4. > I think it's pretty close to being committable, but I fear that time > is running out for 9.4. I'm not aware of any open issues in the basic patch, other then scaling the reported calling statistics by nloops, which should be trivial. I'll post an updated patch later today. I don't really expect all the add-on patches to make it into 9.4 - they don't seem to have gotten much attention yet - but at least the inverse transition functions for the basic arithmetic aggregates should be doable I hope. best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
