Hi, On 2014-04-21 17:39:39 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > But do we really want a *guc* for it though? Isn't it enough (and in fact > better) with a configure switch to pick the implementation when multiple > are available, that could then be set by default for example by the freebsd > ports build? That's a lot less "overhead" to keep dragging around...
Well, we don't know at all it's just freebsd that's affected. In fact, I would be surprised if there aren't other platforms that regressed due to this. I think a configure switch actually ends up being more code than the GUC... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
