On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote: > > I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think > > that given the nature of datatype the current default will break > > inserts for common usage pattern and that's much worse than not > > being able to use the index for some operators. > > I agree. We should choose the most general option as the default. > +1. Less operators are supported by the now-named jsonb_hash_ops but at least users won't be surprised by failures caused by too long index records. -- Michael
