Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote: > >> On 23/04/14 00:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >>>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change? > > >>> FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on > >>> this question. > > >> I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think > >> that given the nature of datatype the current default will break > >> inserts for common usage pattern and that's much worse than not > >> being able to use the index for some operators. > > > I agree. We should choose the most general option as the default. > > That seems to be the consensus, but now we need a name for the > soon-to-be-not-default opclass. What's a good short adjective for it?
"comprehensive"? Not particularly short ... According to Merriam Webster: Synonyms all-embracing, all-in [chiefly British], all-inclusive, broad-gauge (or broad-gauged), compendious, complete, encyclopedic, cover-all, cyclopedic, embracive, exhaustive, full, global, inclusive, in-depth, omnibus, panoramic, thorough, universal Related Words broad, catholic, encyclical, general, inclusionary, overall; cosmic (also cosmical), extensive, far, far-reaching, grand, large, panoptic, sweeping, vast, wide, wide-ranging; blanket, indiscriminate, unrestricted jsonb_omnibus_ops ? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers