On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:28:21AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > No, I think you're missing the point of what I'm saying, and I think > the addition is at best misleading. I would avoid talk of key value > pairs, anyway, that's not all that's in a json document (it might be > an array, for example). > > How about: > > This data type allows for faster access to values in the json document and > faster and more useful indexing of json.
OK, I used you wording. You are right I didn't understand it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
