On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 04:20:26PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > We rarely get into specific numers like this. It says "higher limit(s)" and
> > hopefully that is enough. If you want to create a documentation 'id' I
> > can like to that for the "higher limits" text.
>
> You don't have to mention a number. Just the fact that there is now
> *no* limit on stored query text length, which is the point. It's also
> nice that the per-entry shared memory overhead is much lower, which as
> I said I think warrants a mention in passing.
OK, I understand now. I also split the item into two separate ones so I
could highlight things. Please see the new ouput --- I ended up
creating a pg_stat_statements section because there are now three items:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-4.html
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
