Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I really don't get what your objection to the setup is. And no, I > don't want them to run concurrently, I'd rather spread out the > cycles.
I wasn't objecting, merely an observation. Note that Tomas mentioned he's okay with running 4 builds at once. My main point here, really, is that having a larger number of animals shouldn't be an impediment for a more complex permutation of configurations, if he's okay with doing that. I assume you wouldn't object to my approving four extra animals running on the same machine, if Tomas wants to go for that. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
