On 8.5.2014 23:48, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 05/08/2014 05:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >>> I really don't get what your objection to the setup is. And no, I >>> don't want them to run concurrently, I'd rather spread out the >>> cycles. >> I wasn't objecting, merely an observation. Note that Tomas >> mentioned he's okay with running 4 builds at once. My main point >> here, really, is that having a larger number of animals shouldn't >> be an impediment for a more complex permutation of configurations, >> if he's okay with doing that. I assume you wouldn't object to my >> approving four extra animals running on the same machine, if Tomas >> wants to go for that.
So, if I get this right, the proposal is to have 7 animals: 1) all branches/locales, frequent builds (every few hours) magpie - gcc fulmar - icc treepie - clang 2) single branch/locale, CLOBBER, built once a week magpie2 - gcc fulmar2 - icc treepie - clang 3) single branch/locale, recursive CLOBBER, built once a month I don't particularly mind the number of animals, although I was shooting for lower number. The only question is - should we use 3 animals for the recursive CLOBBER too? I mean, one for each compiler? regards Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
