On 05/15/2014 07:47 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 15.5.2014 22:07, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yes, I've seen that. Frankly, a test that takes something like 500
hours is a bit crazy.
Maybe. It certainly is not a test people will use during development.
But if it can detect some hard-to-find errors in the code, that might
possibly lead to serious problems, then +1 from me to run them at least
on one animal. 500 hours is ~3 weeks, which is not that bad IMHO.
Also, once you know where it fails the developer can run just that
single test (which might take minutes/hours, but not days).
I have made a change that omits the snapshot sanity check for
CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY cases, but keeps it for all others. See
<https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/server-code/commit/abd946918279b7683056a4fc3156415ef31a4675>
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
