Josh Berkus wrote: > I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > client utils? No?
There are others who think this has already happened. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers