On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Josh Berkus wrote: >>>> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to >>>> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other >>>> client utils? No? >>> >>> There are others who think this has already happened. >>> >> >> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. > > It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's > too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't > particularly like the new name. > I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any > concensus for doing so either.
Ah, I see. There was a name change, and I lost the argument. Got it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
