On 05/26/2014 07:10 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> I don't really object to doing an unlocked check for another such >> database, but I'm not convinced that additional locking to try to >> prevent a race is worth its keep. > +1 on the nannyism, and +1 to ignoring the race.
Okay, I'll submit a new patch with racy nannyism and some grammar changes that Tom and I have been discussing in private. -- Vik -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
